Date: Sat, 04 Dec 1999 11:20:49 -0500 From: Dennis <dennis@etinc.com> To: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Message-ID: <Version.32.19991122105556.02b0a4f0@etinc.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911211948060.81323-100000@jade.chc-chimes.c om> References: <199911220127.UAA28430@etinc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 07:49 PM 11/21/99 -0500, you wrote: >On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Dennis wrote: > >> The nightmare of instability of 3.x continues whilst the braintrust flogs >> away at 4.x. Its really a damn shame. And why is 3.x so much slower than >> 2.2.8? Will 4.0 be slower yet? > >Your vagueness and lack of evidence is astounding. The "evidence" is that 3.x chokes in conditions that 2.2.8 and LINUX dont on the exact same hardware. Sorry I dont have time to present a case to you. The number of customer i have that still run 2.2.8 is perhaps "circumstantial" evidence, but significant. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Version.32.19991122105556.02b0a4f0>