Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 08:29:16 +0000 From: tech-lists <tech-lists@zyxst.net> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: firewall choice Message-ID: <X8C43AprLKhr3xxy@rpi4.local>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--cmc/6UCdWruhTTy3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, What's the "best" [1] choice for firewalling these days, in the list's opin= ion? There's pf, ipf and ipfw. Which is the one being most recently developed/up= dated? I'm used to using pf, have done for over a decade. But OpenBSD's pf has div= erged=20 a lot more from when it first came across. There seems to be a lot more opt= ions. Is FreeBSD's pf being actively developed still? ipfw seems a lot more syntatically complex than pf. Is it more capable also? I know nothing about ipf yet. [1] up-to-date, versatile, low overhead, high throughput, IPv6-able, traffic shaping/queueing thanks, --=20 J. --cmc/6UCdWruhTTy3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl/AuNEACgkQs8o7QhFz NAW97hAAl6rawxMigO9Dx4EaB1iMqogdUazHVOD9fpHLqlM3b+TAqFt7dhehrs/u iOdC8uZomZ1HdVNDlP4GqAtMYYatxuNJxSKFS/jQPKzbWHWNaAhzcmcs1sVMOtpB +zGu3zGsxYw0onN6oR/hwlhWCH3wBKNgcfujoJ/CR45bF5GFFr/zuYM1vjAkA0vK DdkXkrt7NkjwHPfo7eMuEzbHjZj7LleQNXNEVT11IcKuFZQyNS35SnUY6enaW/4E P0iD9I+Kp1YMOiTETHZabPdndNLEISFJkqEnz8F1xzbTrvsmlr0ZF/WVyfgp1ZEY FCOIp9At9ikxLxRttt8mQXX5M12ffLXPCc4l0FWK92WIaa++rlvvoyqiPmyaPhbJ e0xoegottiRF/vBRcRjeTkNowsz6h0cWBSdC7PPysITDSFiQ38LbsM6qQ764T+6k JF91xs7w89oCO1i8ftZG51eTZyi0sRrwK2ZdNuyXXCGZCsiR3cNAaSCB+lskEacW AXnaZZhnh/5Mlv90DIrsyruBQFgOLCvwPtFLlBwaMGm3kx+g6feIwyM39nKqPR/N 62MauGgpPmsO3Rlj1bS549zBBbyQSRgJ0n1QCucOgCVMvpfAQ6nROXH0n/Ye7GqM RpK499l92nnl6vbgCnTXewL89/1UVYWddzGHElRqdljgg3bq+zg= =bQKL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cmc/6UCdWruhTTy3--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?X8C43AprLKhr3xxy>