Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 14:55:26 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: advocacy@FreeBSD.org, Gilbert Gong <ggong@cal.alumni.berkeley.edu>, Jeremiah Gowdy <jeremiah@sherline.com>, Anthony Atkielski <anthony@freebie.atkielski.com> Subject: Re: Microsoft Advocacy? Message-ID: <XFMail.011220145526.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.011220145102.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20-Dec-01 John Baldwin wrote: > Err, this is not valid. There aren't 4 statements there are two: > > (1) For a specific instance, (2) FreeBSD is valid as a desktop. Actually, it would be better written as so: Someone belives that there exists some specific circumstance such that FreeBSD is a valid desktop. The opposite of this statement (as should be evident from basic Math proof courses) is: For all specific circumstances, FreeBSD is not a valid desktop. This, then, is what Jeremiah "believes". -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.011220145526.jhb>