Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 13:18:20 -0600 (CST) From: Conrad Sabatier <conrads@cox.net> To: John Reynolds~ <jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: is our printf(1) behavior correct w.r.t \0 escapes? Message-ID: <XFMail.20030128131820.conrads@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <15926.54074.941041.75523@chlx255.ch.intel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28-Jan-2003 John Reynolds~ wrote: > > [ On Tuesday, January 28, Conrad Sabatier wrote: ] >> >> Unless it's already been done. :-) Can you check the RCS Id in >> /usr/src/usr.bin/printf/printf.c? Here's what I have: >> >> $FreeBSD: src/usr.bin/printf/printf.c,v 1.26 2002/09/04 23:29:05 dwmalone >> Exp $ >> >> Now, if we have identical versions, we have a bona fide mystery on our hands >> here. :-) >> > > Well, this is what I have: > > "$FreeBSD: src/usr.bin/printf/printf.c,v 1.12.6.6 2002/04/29 16:45:16 > jmallett > > according to the CVS repo, 1.26 has RELENG_5_0* tags as well as "HEAD" while > the latest on the RELENG_4 branch is still what I have--1.12.6.6. Ah, OK. So there *is* a difference. I can't imagine there being anything unsafe about using the 5.0 version under -stable. But it would be best to confirm this. Perhaps you should file a PR? -- Conrad Sabatier <conrads@cox.net> - "In Unix veritas" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20030128131820.conrads>