Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 14:12:16 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Rostislav Krasny <rosti_bsd@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IRQ 2 problem Message-ID: <XFMail.20031231141216.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20031231185358.66023.qmail@web14812.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 31-Dec-2003 Rostislav Krasny wrote: > --- "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: >> In message: <20031230.190927.108191769.imp@bsdimp.com> >> "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> writes: >> : The reason that it iasn't been committed is because it is >> incorrect. >> : >> : >> > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=15473+0+archive/2003/freebsd-arch/20030831.freebsd-ar > ch >> : >> : has the particulars. >> >> Does your machine have an APIC? My laptop doesn't seem to exhibit >> the problem. > > No, it doesn't seem to have an APIC. This is Pentium MMX 200MHz machine > based on Intel's 430TX chipset. > > What is the correct way to fix this IRQ 2 problem? I can help to test it. IRQ 2 in FreeBSD is spelled IRQ 9. If a PNP device wants to use IRQ 2, it can be set to IRQ 2 in hardware, but it must use IRQ 9 when doing the bus_alloc_resource() and bus_setup_intr(). -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20031231141216.jhb>