Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 26 Jan 1999 07:46:18 +0100 (CET)
From:      Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl>
To:        Andrew Gordon <arg@arg1.demon.co.uk>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Subject:   Re: 4.0-Current, netscape halts system
Message-ID:  <XFMail.990126074618.asmodai@wxs.nl>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990126012634.23694A-100000@server.arg.sj.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 26-Jan-99 Andrew Gordon wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>> :One variable may be available memory.  On my system, with default
>> :datasize
>> :limit of 16M from login.conf, Netscape coredumps very frequently.  With
>> 
>>     I've been using netscape on a 24bit color system for well over a
>>     year and have never had a serious memory leak problem or X
>>     session ( or machine ) crashing due to it.  I don't leave the
>>     netscape window open all the time, though... I tend to exit
>>     out of it when I'm not using it.

This would indicate that it might have to do then with prolonged exposure
to memory and the memory-system(s) (swap, paging). Is there anyway to
monitor the syscalls and the amount of memory used and released by each
call Matt? Hope ye see where I'm getting at...

> 1) I'm not sure I would necesarily accuse Netscape of having a leak:
>    what with caching pages in RAM and the allocation policy of whatever
>    malloc they use, maybe it really needs this much and would stabilise
>    at some size of 100M+ - I just don't have the swap space to find out.

Yer kidding right? A program that _needs_ 100 MB or more? Surely yer
kidding... I haven't seen a program in normal corporate/home use that
justifies the memory usage of 100 MB or more including NetScape's
Navigator/Communicator.
 
> 2) I have never seen a system crash as such.  However, having the X
> server killed due to out-of-swap leaves the console fouled up and so
> could easily be mis-described as a crash.

I wonder if X could be the originator of the problems, my guess is it can't
since Linux uses the same X and I haven't heard any complaints from that
corner.

Also it's nice that the program dumps core, but afaik without debug symbols
it's not much use.

---
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven          It's a Dance of Energy,
asmodai(at)wxs.nl                 when the Mind goes Binary...
Network/Security Specialist      <http://home.wxs.nl/~asmodai>;
BSD & picoBSD: The Power to Serve     <http://www.freebsd.org>;

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.990126074618.asmodai>