Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 15:37:16 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin <jobaldwi@vt.edu> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: solid NFS patch #6 avail for -current - need testers files) Message-ID: <XFMail.990421153716.jobaldwi@vt.edu> In-Reply-To: <199904211759.KAA07157@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 21-Apr-99 Matthew Dillon wrote: > Most of the bug fixes have been backported to -stable. Getting the new > VM system into -stable ( which I want to do just after the 3.2 release ) > is going to require brute force, though. Unfortunately, the most recent > fixes to NFS fall into that category so NFS-centric installations may need > to use -current. > > -Matt > Matthew Dillon > <dillon@backplane.com> I'm curious, is there any plan to backport egcs to -stable or no? Also, as a side note: good thing we went with egcs, as it was just announced that egcs is now the official gcc. --- John Baldwin <jobaldwi@vt.edu> -- http://members.freedomnet.com/~jbaldwin/ PGP Key: http://members.freedomnet.com/~jbaldwin/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.990421153716.jobaldwi>