Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 01:58:02 +0000 From: Teran McKinney <sega01@go-beyond.org> To: Yoshihiro Ota <ota@j.email.ne.jp> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adding support for py-package w/ setup.cfg but w/o setup.py Message-ID: <YdT7Kt0YYDmV7mdU@daemon> In-Reply-To: <20220104194633.e087cd0f7dd8be67eae5c589@j.email.ne.jp> References: <20220104194633.e087cd0f7dd8be67eae5c589@j.email.ne.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2022-01-04 19-46-33 , Yoshihiro Ota wrote: > Hi, > > I recently create a new PyPI tool for FreeBSD. > Based on PyPI's instruction, I have setup.cfg only without setup.py. > https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/tutorials/packaging-projects/ suggests go with setup.cfg only for simplicity. > > I'm now trying to make a port for it. > However, FreeBSD ports expects a setup.py file. > > It looks if we can run "from setuptools import setup; setup()" in Mk/Uses/python.mk if PYSETUP file doesn't exit. > > I'm wondering if some FreeBSD python port expert can consider no PYSETUP file configuration. > > Hiro Hi Hiro, For packages without a setup.py, in many cases there may be a pyproject.toml with PEP-518 support. Some of these use setuptools still, others may use Poetry, flit, etc. For these, build should usually be used. python3.9 -m build, etc. As far as how this plays out with ports, I'm not sure exactly, but wanted to put my two cents out there. -Teran
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?YdT7Kt0YYDmV7mdU>