Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 16:30:21 +0000 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> To: igor.ostapenko@pm.me Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Add jail execution environment support to the FreeBSD test suite Message-ID: <ZdjIHZFy8rF-PDxB@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: <2bjQNp1msrv-_AqyamMun6kY-SCqbgPm3Q7DqVQHAYlqvFkiE1i85svfIT-QQdUG1cg3cKippyTyv8Z-5nbLu4WaMutgZQ7KT-YYo_5Pbro=@pm.me> References: <2bjQNp1msrv-_AqyamMun6kY-SCqbgPm3Q7DqVQHAYlqvFkiE1i85svfIT-QQdUG1cg3cKippyTyv8Z-5nbLu4WaMutgZQ7KT-YYo_5Pbro=@pm.me>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 08:57:54PM +0000, igor.ostapenko@pm.me wrote: > 2 The Idea > > The idea is not new. A test could be running in a jail -- it provides the > required isolation with minimum or zero effort from a test. This generally sounds good. One minor concern I have is how this would interact with the ability to run the test suite in a jail. This is imperfectly supported today (IIRC ~350 failures on amd64), but it's quite userful for testing sweeping userspace-only tests like libsys and I'd love to see support expanded and improved (failures fixed or tests skipped, poudriere jail support, etc). Thanks, Brooks
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ZdjIHZFy8rF-PDxB>