Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 18:07:44 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org> To: Chris <portmaster@bsdforge.com> Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: poudriere(8) short circuits my ability to build packages Message-ID: <Zg7QUFL4YyE5gauV@fc.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <7aba89d38b4d0e84f8ba941452215f73@bsdforge.com> References: <78550638a3787fd0897093fdad463a00@bsdforge.com> <qv7yz37n2hb5qqua6nqgcplllrzd2opsrofdbu2rok5uheisd7@phexm6l6gyj3> <7aba89d38b4d0e84f8ba941452215f73@bsdforge.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > > hint using jail is not it, poudriere > > leverages jails, but we could do without jail while providing the same > > value. > Not if it imposes itself. It does not. The complexity of keeping such a huge number of interdepend ports/packages building and running is not imposed by poudriere, it's imposed by the general development pace. Having tools like poudriere helps enormously to keep things together. > If I've misunderstood the message reported to me by pkg(8) in my attempt > to create a package, and it *doesn't* prevent me from creating a > package in my chosen environment. It does not prevent you, but the port (not pkg) message is written in relation to poudriere. So yes, I think you misunderstood the message. To be fair, the topic is complicated and formulating a message that can not be misunderstood is non-trivial. -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Zg7QUFL4YyE5gauV>