Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 11:25:48 +0200 From: Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mount SMB Message-ID: <ZtgnnGk41mzXjAQI@rail.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <trinity-ebe100d9-2909-49af-bdfa-d509e0835b2b-1725438423547@3c-app-mailcom-bs02> References: <trinity-2273f71b-07af-48f6-b8e8-b98e289db6f2-1724927699916@3c-app-mailcom-bs06> <20240829220603.c2c6fba0.freebsd@edvax.de> <0a30aafe-659c-43db-855d-01de824e8f9f@gmx.at> <trinity-ebe100d9-2909-49af-bdfa-d509e0835b2b-1725438423547@3c-app-mailcom-bs02>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 10:27:03AM CEST, Nikos Vassiliadis <nvass@gmx.com> said: > > > > Sent: Monday, September 02, 2024 at 1:18 PM > > From: "infoomatic" <infoomatic@gmx.at> > > To: questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: mount SMB > > > > beware: mount_smbfs only supports protocol version 1, which is hardly > > used any more. Modern systems have been using versions 3.11+ for a long > > time now. I have been hoping for an upgrade for a long time already > > Hi, > > Exactly. I didn't mention it but that is problem. I haven't even tried > to use the native solution as it's a bad idea and I am pretty sure it > won't work anymore... > > It seems that smbnetfs is the only way to mount a contemporary SMB share. rclone might also be a solution -- Erwan David
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ZtgnnGk41mzXjAQI>