Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 20:38:34 +0200 From: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be> To: <noackjr@rice.edu>, <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: why? Message-ID: <a05111b03b97c59def0b5@[10.0.1.60]> In-Reply-To: <000801c24112$7f3769f0$0a01a8c0@COMPGEEK> References: <000801c24112$7f3769f0$0a01a8c0@COMPGEEK>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 3:38 AM -0500 2002/08/11, Jon Noack wrote:
> why does it post immediately and reliably from one account when it takes
> forever to post the other (and then only about half the time)?
It all depends on the server and the route that the message is
taking. Then your come-back copy depends on the return path.
> both
> emails are sent through the same client and the same smtp server. i
> wish i didn't have to use Microsoft for work -- i think this is another
> of bill's tricks...
Let's look at the headers of the first message, specifically at
the date/time stamps:
| Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.18]) by
| mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7205572F;
| Sun, 11 Aug 2002 01:23:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from
| owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG)
Okay, the message was submitted at 03:16:27 -0500, and here it's
already been received by the FreeBSD machines, passed through the
mailing list server, and on it's way back out within six-and-a-half
minutes. That is, assuming that all servers are in perfect time
sync. If they're not, the overall end-to-end time could easily be
just a matter of a few seconds.
| Received: from patriarch.dnsalias.org
| (adsl-65-69-3-83.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net [65.69.3.83])
| by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A2343E75
| for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 01:22:59 -0700 (PDT)
| (envelope-from noackjr@rice.edu)
This would seem to be the place where most of the delay occurred.
However, it would be difficult to determine what caused the delay.
It could be a problem with the sending system, or it could be a
problem with the receiving system. But without more information
(including the logs of both the sending & receiving systems), it's
hard to tell what was the real cause.
| Received: from COMPGEEK ([127.0.0.1]) by patriarch.dnsalias.org with
| Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.2600.1); Sun, 11 Aug 2002 03:16:27 -0500
And that's the original submission.
Now, let's look at the headers of the second message:
| Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.18]) by
| mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F83A55B10; Sun, 11 Aug
| 2002 01:32:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from
| owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG)
Well, this message was received, processed, and re-transmitted in
just five seconds, if you believe the time stamps.
| Received: from COMPGEEK ([127.0.0.1]) by patriarch.dnsalias.org with
| Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.2600.1); Sun, 11 Aug 2002 03:32:49 -0500
Here's the original message submission.
Looking at the other headers (which I omitted), it would appear
that the paths are pretty much identical between the two messages.
--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E W+++(--) N+ !w---
O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a05111b03b97c59def0b5>