Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 03:25:42 +0800 From: "jan gestre" <freebsd.ph@gmail.com> Cc: "FreeBSD Questions" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Are hardware vendors starting to bail on FreeBSD ... ? Message-ID: <a25afc300607281225w18bff942rc73dae2bd12f4337@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <54BDA592-E798-4A1C-A53E-72C8707B3630@shire.net> References: <88D3FDF2A772ED44BCF8C91626ECD06905FD0A75@sm-cala-xm20.swna.wdpr.disney.com> <54BDA592-E798-4A1C-A53E-72C8707B3630@shire.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7/28/06, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC <chad@shire.net> wrote: > > > On Jul 27, 2006, at 5:41 PM, Born, Clinton wrote: > > > Really? I wouldn't want such a myopic view when choosing to > > allocate our > > shareholders dollars. Best tool for the job. Period! > > That is not as easy as you make it out to be. WHat one might in the > short term see as the best tool may not be such in 2 years when > support is dropped and you are in a forced obsolescence and have to > replace it with something else... So making value judgments like > tools that are known to be well supported on FReeBSD for example is > part of determining the best tool for the job > > these are FUD! always think positive and don't be a cynic. nobody knows what will happen two years from now, right?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a25afc300607281225w18bff942rc73dae2bd12f4337>