Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:55:57 -0300 (BRT) From: "Nenhum_de_Nos" <matheus@eternamente.info> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Powerd and est / eist functionality Message-ID: <a333ac6f65b2061fbc46994599f969ba.squirrel@lamneth> In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.2.20100322150534.032bee30@mail.sstec.com> References: <5.2.1.1.2.20100322150534.032bee30@mail.sstec.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, March 22, 2010 19:57, John Long wrote: > dmesg shows > cpu0: <ACPI CPU> on acpi0 > est0: <Enhanced SpeedStep Frequency Control> on cpu0 > est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. > est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 6160b2506000b25 > device_attach: est0 attach returned 6 > p4tcc0: <CPU Frequency Thermal Control> on cpu0 > cpu1: <ACPI CPU> on acpi0 > est1: <Enhanced SpeedStep Frequency Control> on cpu1 > est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. > est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 6160b2506000b25 > device_attach: est1 attach returned 6 > p4tcc1: <CPU Frequency Thermal Control> on cpu1 I get similar output on 8-STABLE and C2Q 9400/9450. wasn't it supposed to attach ok ? matheus -- We will call you cygnus, The God of balance you shall be A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a333ac6f65b2061fbc46994599f969ba.squirrel>