Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 11:03:22 +0000 From: Grzegorz Junka <list1@gjunka.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox (Doesn't) Build Message-ID: <a3c414cc-2cf6-2dec-c467-c2ed0aa5c1e6@gjunka.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJuc1zM1JqzYYUOHTP=VpAqi6Rz%2BEvGAW6OyODsg9W_mjH6xMg@mail.gmail.com> References: <BL2PR05MB2274B42AD1B2CFE4B5215767BB550@BL2PR05MB2274.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <BL2PR05MB22748A248A96B4ECBE5E40EBBB550@BL2PR05MB2274.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAJuc1zM1JqzYYUOHTP=VpAqi6Rz%2BEvGAW6OyODsg9W_mjH6xMg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/11/2017 07:14, Jonathan Chen wrote: > On 12 November 2017 at 12:16, Patrick Dorion <dorionpatrick@outlook.com> wrote: >> What's the difference between using Poudriere or Synth, though? >> >> This is a clean system, I can't imagine a jail being cleaner... it was unpacked from the DVD the day before yesterday.... > Both are clean room builds; ie where only minimal build dependancies > are installed for each port build. The main difference is that: > * poudriere uses jails to achieve this > * synth uses unionfs+chroot to achieve this Does it mean synth can't be used on ZFS? AFAIK unionfs isn't properly supported on ZFS, i.e. a file that exists in the underlying fs can't be marked as deleted in the overlying fs. GrzegorzJ
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a3c414cc-2cf6-2dec-c467-c2ed0aa5c1e6>