Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:29:27 +0300 From: "Vlad GALU" <dudu@dudu.ro> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: fdescfs/devfs Message-ID: <ad79ad6b0608222329j5d43dae9h9e1408926bd9cf6c@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Is it just a wrong impression on my side, or devfs really
supersedes fdescfs ? I've been using /dev/fd/* for a while having the
impression I had fdescfs mounted on /dev/fd, and I hadn't. I didn't
see any differences whatsoever in terms of usage.
--
If it's there, and you can see it, it's real.
If it's not there, and you can see it, it's virtual.
If it's there, and you can't see it, it's transparent.
If it's not there, and you can't see it, you erased it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ad79ad6b0608222329j5d43dae9h9e1408926bd9cf6c>