Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 02:50:57 +0200 From: Martin Matuska <mm@FreeBSD.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, freebsd-git <freebsd-git@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: OpenZFS imports, status update Message-ID: <aed58350-a351-7fb0-ee22-daa6d41ed2c9@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfrM5rKo6AKhHMCbp3O8ZoxqCkGNT3aRrSwE%2B6HzS7MDJA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CANCZdfrM5rKo6AKhHMCbp3O8ZoxqCkGNT3aRrSwE%2B6HzS7MDJA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Warner, thank you very much for the update. If I understand this correctly, the way to go in the future is a 1:1=20 merge from openzfs/master to e.g. vendor/openzfs/master and from=20 openzfs/zfs-2.1-release to vendor/openzfs/zfs-2.1-release? And as a=20 second step a subtree merge from vendor/openzfs/* to main or stable/13? Martin On 22. 4. 2021 20:34, Warner Losh wrote: > Hey Martin, > > I just wanted to let you know we've been working towards enabling=20 > pushing vendor/openzfs/* branches. There's one big issue that needs to = > be corrected. Currently, we'll do one email per revision hash on such=20 > imports, so openzfs would generate ~10k emails, which would be=20 > undesirable. Li Wen is working on enabling one email per push for=20 > vendor/* which would eliminate this problem. We hope to be doing test=20 > pushes to the testing repo early=C2=A0next week, and if all goes well=20 > enabling this in production shortly after. > > IMHO, you've made a compelling case: the size is small, the coupling=20 > between the projects is tight and we get some extra benefit from=20 > having a finer-grained vendor branch that we import from. The plan to=20 > import directly from vendor/openzfs/zfs-2.1 would normally be=20 > concerning because it's not following the usual main -> stable/X=20 > workflow. In this case, though, since upstream follows that workflow=20 > we won't lose things that get pushed to stable/13 that aren't also=20 > relevant to main. There's at least some configuration needed to allow=20 > the merge commits to stable/13, but we're still working out the last=20 > details. > > So we'll be good to go soon (1-2 weeks until you can land commits, I=20 > think). Does that work for you? > > Warner >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?aed58350-a351-7fb0-ee22-daa6d41ed2c9>