Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 5 Apr 2009 14:24:01 +0100 (BST)
From:      Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Advice on a multithreaded netisr  patch?
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904051422280.12639@fledge.watson.org>
In-Reply-To: <gra7mq$ei8$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:  <gra7mq$ei8$1@ger.gmane.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Sun, 5 Apr 2009, Ivan Voras wrote:

> I thought this has something to deal with NIC moderation (em) but can't 
> really explain it. The bad performance part (not the jump) is also visible 
> over the loopback interface.

FYI, if you want high performance, you really want a card supporting multiple 
input queues -- igb, cxgb, mxge, etc.  if_em-only cards are fundamentally less 
scalable in an SMP environment because they require input or output to occur 
only from one CPU at a time.

Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0904051422280.12639>