Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 02:03:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: GT <catch.all@marketmentat.com> Cc: postmaster@freebsd.org, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What's wrong with this picture? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906010202520.27186@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <1243809390.6672.17.camel@ubuntu> References: <20090530160540.C5BCD106575F@hub.freebsd.org> <20090531142921.B65025@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <1243809390.6672.17.camel@ubuntu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> passed muster from any reasonable moderator (aye, but there's the rub: > who gets to define 'reasonable'?). > > The phrase "You're fast to agree with our resident M$ troll when he > argues against government control of anything, even of protecting the > population from a 'free' market that's happy to profit by poisoning > people in body or mind" stands in stark contrast to your exhortation > that he "focus [his] energies on things you do know something about". > > I'm against moderation, for the simple reason that people who want to be > moderators will bring their baggage to their efforts (like your > "corporations kill the environment and are protected by the 'free' > market" stuff, or my "government is the problem, full stop: Caedite Eos" > stuff). That is to say, anyone who wants to be a moderator ought to be > disqualified from doing so (that goes for anyone who wants to control so you like to moderate me, being against moderation
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0906010202520.27186>