Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 6 Jun 2009 01:31:16 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se>
Cc:        Gabriel Lavoie <glavoie@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, utisoft@gmail.com, Valentin Bud <valentin.bud@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: Opinion request about a file server
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906060130230.86137@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <20090605232213.GA73749@owl.midgard.homeip.net>
References:  <139b44430906050557v4ce23a13r259535c3e839deb0@mail.gmail.com> <d05df8620906051352x22765050j9af832ad38b48eb9@mail.gmail.com> <b79ecaef0906051421h2054af18u2da4a02cda2dee5a@mail.gmail.com> <d05df8620906051506o1f120c97pd5ddabf51fb8552c@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906060041230.85776@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20090605232213.GA73749@owl.midgard.homeip.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Not counting the CPU and its power circuitry, I would be very suprised if
> the other components on a normal motherboard pulled as much as half of that
> even when under load.
>
> In fact a typical modern desktop computer will, when idle, draw less than
> 100W for the whole system.  It is not even difficult to put together a
> system that will stay under 100W even when under load.
>
but power supplies are not really efficient when used at small load.
maybe some newer are better...



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0906060130230.86137>