Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 13:50:43 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> To: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Edho P Arief <edhoprima@gmail.com>, Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> Subject: Re: gpart -b 34 versus gpart -b 1024 Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1007251349370.3572@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimpeKJhqtihuOFwU%2BtQZeCVXy0-fbYUsoGgN%2BeF@mail.gmail.com> References: <4C4BA50B.6050507@langille.org> <4C4BB672.3090109@langille.org> <AANLkTinKEBb5S9REK3nn8GF3U=jRAtYMBBfsC5TB8Xj4@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=RGe7ygDYpF2u3BN4oPYSgyUUijOuLnz2q=XXY@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimpeKJhqtihuOFwU%2BtQZeCVXy0-fbYUsoGgN%2BeF@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010, Adam Vande More wrote: AVM> > AVM> > shouldn't it start at 2049? Starting at 2048 means it starts at 2048th AVM> > logical block which is 512 bytes off from physical block, doesn't it? AVM> > <http://www.asciiribbon.org>; AVM> > AVM> AVM> blocks start at 0 Well, to be exact, LBA starts at 0, while sector numbers (in CHS address method) at 1 (which always suprized me ;) -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1007251349370.3572>