Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 13:49:28 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Sean Bruno <seanbru@yahoo-inc.com> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: bce(4) man page updates Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1205311345030.83987@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <1338486809.2985.10.camel@powernoodle-l7.corp.yahoo.com> References: <1338424909.9051.12.camel@powernoodle-l7.corp.yahoo.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1205310628200.81499@wonkity.com> <1338484537.2985.8.camel@powernoodle-l7.corp.yahoo.com> <1338486809.2985.10.camel@powernoodle-l7.corp.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 31 May 2012, Sean Bruno wrote: >> >> Indeed. Much more gooder wordingness. Updated! >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/bce_man.txt >> > > Updated again, looks like one of the tuneables has changed in -head: > > hw.bce.loose_rx_mtu --> hw.bce.strict_rx_mtu One other idea that's a little shorter on multiple values: "this value can only be of the set 1, 2, 4 or 8 (default 2)." --> "this value can only be of the set 1, 2 (default), 4 or 8." These are subjective. For example, I prefer "goodinger wordiness."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1205311345030.83987>