Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 01:13:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Marco Muskus <marcomuskus@une.net.co> Cc: centos@centos.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208060110570.2396@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <501EE212.3090403@une.net.co> References: <CAFBRBcoxr5HLVipX5L5=qhEZ7pOW%2B4NmWJwy3GsL_DH74Fm%2ByQ@mail.gmail.com> <501D8A3D.1000707@une.net.co> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208051321170.21508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <501EE212.3090403@une.net.co>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>> with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be the >>> differentiator. >> true. it is consistently slow. >> >> REALLY from what tale do you people get such a statements. > > There is no tale, only a feature set: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zfs#Features > And everything everyone writes is always true.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1208060110570.2396>