Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 16:21:20 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Another CSS suggestion: pre-wrap Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307281618360.11880@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <51F59807.4040308@FreeBSD.org> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307281057160.9642@wonkity.com> <51F558D2.1010808@FreeBSD.org> <51F56688.5040900@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307281308390.10705@wonkity.com> <51F57011.2000603@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307281328360.10705@wonkity.com> <51F57C6E.9050608@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307281603580.11880@wonkity.com> <51F59807.4040308@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > On 2013.07.29. 0:09, Warren Block wrote: >> On Sun, 28 Jul 2013, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: >> >>> On 2013.07.28. 21:37, Warren Block wrote: >>>> >>>> Line numbering is nice sometimes, although sometimes it's easy to confuse >>>> with content. Syntax highlighting could be useful in places like the >>>> Architecture Handbook, but as you say, we don't have it now. >>>> >>>> Would you agree that using this line wrap now would not prevent switching >>>> to other methods in the future? >> >>> I believe it is possible to make them work together. But using these >>> extensions requires using Saxon as the XSLT processor, which is Java-based >>> and slower than xsltproc. Even if we end up using Java for PDF rendering, >>> it would be better to keep the XHTML build fast and Java-free so that >>> committers can easily test their work. >> >> Do you mean Java is needed to do the linewrap on XHTML, or that it would be >> needed to do line numbers and syntax highlighting? > For the latter two only. Excellent! What do you think about adding it after the doc slush ends in a week or so?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1307281618360.11880>