Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 7 Apr 2014 17:05:32 +0200 (CEST)
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no>
To:        Chris Nehren <cnehren+freebsd-stable@pobox.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Note for those pulling in new ZFS feature flags
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404071656540.9102@mail.fig.ol.no>
In-Reply-To: <20140407145511.GA16747@behemoth>
References:  <20140407135421.GA16385@behemoth> <CAFHbX1%2BCerhdfo-VB4dj_JZAkp79b_KD7T0TCxFWTLGFsu-Mpw@mail.gmail.com> <20140407145511.GA16747@behemoth>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 7 Apr 2014 10:55-0400, Chris Nehren wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 15:36:21 +0100, Tom Evans wrote:
> > > I solved this by re-running `gpart bootcode` for the afflicted
> > > drives.  This was a bit trying, though, as my workstation is the
> > > only FreeBSD machine I have readily available.  So, for those
> > > upgrading their zpools, be careful and remember to fix the
> > > bootcode if you're using ZFS for the root filesystem.
> > 
> > ISTR that "zpool upgrade" will also remind you to do this if bootfs is
> > true for the pool you upgraded.
> > 
> > Also, it is always worth having around a bootable memstick available
> > with the zfs code you are actually running in order to use as a
> > recovery disk in circumstances like this.
> 
> I'm fairly certain there was no such message, or I would have
> dutifully done what it said.  I definitely do know there is a
> message of that kind when attaching a disk to a mirror, and I've
> followed through there without issue.

See:

http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/10/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/cmd/zpool/zpool_main.c?view=markup#l4992

Consider this a lesson learned. Yes, I too was bitten by this once, 
but never again. ;-) Luckily, I recovered using a snapshot image.

Whenever I upgrade a ZFS system which has a ZFS boot pool, I always 
upgrade the bootblocks even if I don't upgrade the boot pool to 
include some new cool zpool feature.

Nevertheless, it's still handy to have a recent snapshot available on 
physical media or as an image file at least.

-- 
+-------------------------------+------------------------------------+
| Vennlig hilsen,               | Best regards,                      |
| Trond Endrestøl,              | Trond Endrestøl,                   |
| IT-ansvarlig,                 | System administrator,              |
| Fagskolen Innlandet,          | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway,  |
| tlf. mob.   952 62 567,       | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567,       |
| sentralbord 61 14 54 00.      | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00.      |
+-------------------------------+------------------------------------+
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr  7 15:29:21 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB4F48CD;
 Mon,  7 Apr 2014 15:29:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E7BBD2C;
 Mon,  7 Apr 2014 15:29:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by wonkity.com (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s37FTDES036598
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
 Mon, 7 Apr 2014 09:29:13 -0600 (MDT)
 (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com)
Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost)
 by wonkity.com (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) with ESMTP id s37FTDMR036595;
 Mon, 7 Apr 2014 09:29:13 -0600 (MDT)
 (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com)
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 09:29:13 -0600 (MDT)
From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
To: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: How to remove X11 support and all ports options depend on X11
In-Reply-To: <5342402D.6070306@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404070928350.36062@wonkity.com>
References: <CAOwMmupogu4xXRL64iGf6Ck_7mHsO=UN5oSr5=G8D6GigXD6Xw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHHBGko+crukS25yQu-z4j=Cp4wQ0ZJDrNThfwd6=sZyc4TbCg@mail.gmail.com>
 <5342402D.6070306@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 07 Apr 2014 09:29:13 -0600 (MDT)
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>;
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 15:29:22 -0000

On Mon, 7 Apr 2014, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
> 'WITHOUT_X11' is obsolete.  What
> you want nowadays is:
>
>    OPTIONS_UNSET+=	x11

Shouldn't that be uppercase X11?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1404071656540.9102>