Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Sep 2017 12:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        Gordon Tetlow <gordon@tetlows.org>, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Removal of catman from base
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.21.1709121210140.54096@orthanc.ca>
In-Reply-To: <77524.1505242222@critter.freebsd.dk>
References:  <20170912184200.GD99742@gmail.com> <77524.1505242222@critter.freebsd.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> That was actually not why catman was brought into the world:  ATT/USL
> thought text-processing was The Goods so they unbundled it base SVR
> and invented catman to make up for the missing nroff.

Not quite.  They (AT&T) sold the rights to sell typeset manuals to some 
publishing house (I forget which), at which point they stopped shipping 
the *roff source for the manpages on the source tapes.  Instead, you got 
pre-formatted "cat" pages on the source tape.  I think this happened 
starting with SVR3.

catman(1) was always about doing bulk nroff runs against the whole of 
/usr/man, because, back in the day, running nroff on demand was slow. 
Even on a 785.  (catman without nroff would have been a no-op.)

--lyndon




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.21.1709121210140.54096>