Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 06:47:19 +0000 (UTC) From: Roderick <hruodr@gmail.com> To: "@lbutlr" <kremels@kreme.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1907030640510.1102@fbsd.local> In-Reply-To: <957EE871-6906-4424-8895-826B517AF581@kreme.com> References: <CAL2OhpoSxnK2Uy_OKxqnWyXuqg=tNBm6wy2r1%2BukVWwPnPrj0g@mail.gmail.com> <20190630092535.7913d305.freebsd@edvax.de> <D25B22FD-2164-4281-AE21-9C5FD188AA38@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1907010639210.1006@fbsd.local> <A3CEF82D-B71D-4B4F-87AD-E3408559DE26@boosten.org> <alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1907011156350.1062@fbsd.local> <957EE871-6906-4424-8895-826B517AF581@kreme.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, @lbutlr wrote: > I went with postfix a long time ago and haven’t regretted it. > The community it very good and the configuration is a lot less opaque > than sendmail. I quoted in a previous post the last paragraph in http://www.meta1.org/compare.html that refers to your criteria of chosing an MTA. > I ran screaming from sendmail. If it wasn’t for postfix I would have > abandoned running a mail server, no way was I going to dive back into > sendmail. Perhaps you should consider if running a mail server is for you. sendmail is not that bad, it is well documented, it bring usefull log, it is old and it is a lot of answers to problems in internet. Indeed I would decide what piece of software to run depending on the effort of configuring it, but this criterium is less valid for such a delicate piece like a mail server continously running in a long period of time. Rodrigo From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jul 3 08:08:58 2019 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B706915CB580 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 08:08:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45FD68ECED for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 08:08:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from guardian.ventu (88-147-119-21.v4.ngi.it [88.147.119.21] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x637viYt002460 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 09:57:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host 88-147-119-21.v4.ngi.it [88.147.119.21] (may be forged) claimed to be guardian.ventu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> Subject: ZFS filesystem full and logs Message-ID: <9a4367f7-d0b5-e1df-0569-b22a9d182a63@netfence.it> Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 09:57:43 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.83 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 45FD68ECED X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 2.44.121.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.91 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:2.44.121.52]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mailserver.netfence.it]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.92)[-0.923,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[netfence.it]; IP_SCORE(-1.67)[ip: (-4.92), ipnet: 2.44.0.0/16(-2.46), asn: 30722(-1.03), country: IT(0.03)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 08:08:58 -0000 Hello. When using UFS, if a filesystem gets full, this is logged via syslogd. Can the same happen somehow for ZFS? If it's possible, how is it done? Thanks Andrea Venturoli
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1907030640510.1102>