Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 19:01:48 +0100 From: infoomatic <infoomatic@gmx.at> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: local-unbound in a jail Message-ID: <bda5e771-b3ff-6071-cecc-007c85508708@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: <dfca984d-95e5-a0e7-3f2e-da0a9925dce8@unixnation.net> References: <dfca984d-95e5-a0e7-3f2e-da0a9925dce8@unixnation.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I highly recommend using vnet enabled jails for network based services ... imho too much hassle with networking issues with non-vnet jails. On 18.02.22 18:02, Steve Kirk wrote: > Afternoon all, > > I suspect that I know the answer to this question, however... I have > tried to run local-unbound in a jail (as I intend to run rspamd in > said jail) but it seems like it doesn't play nicely because there's no > loopback address *inside* the jail which is the only interface this > service is designed to work with. > > Trying to keep things minimal but I think I should be installing > unbound or named from ports if I want a caching DNS server inside a > jail, rather than abusing local-unbound? > > Cheers, > Steve >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bda5e771-b3ff-6071-cecc-007c85508708>