Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2018 17:39:38 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 225626] r325865 malloc vs bzero Message-ID: <bug-225626-8-RsDlqNTq6z@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-225626-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-225626-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225626 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |brooks@FreeBSD.org Resolution|--- |Works As Intended Status|New |Closed --- Comment #1 from Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> --- I'd agree it's pointless, but there's seriously nothing wrong with the fix other than making a path that isn't performance relevant slightly slower. If you want to submit a patch that would likely be fine. Bug reports aren't the places for this discussion. Note that memset should be used in preference to bzero as the compiler should be able to elide most of the cost of the memset since it can emit it inline and then delete the dead stores. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-225626-8-RsDlqNTq6z>