Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 10:52:48 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Michal_Van=c4=8do?= <michal@microwave.sk>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mlx5 irq Message-ID: <c2fc9301-f085-189f-ca3a-42d1f97fd870@selasky.org> In-Reply-To: <c9f8bd7f-6d9d-bb6e-307c-a19c9730b564@microwave.sk> References: <0aa09fcc-dfcc-005e-8834-2a758ba6a03f@microwave.sk> <94978a05-94c6-cc55-229c-5a3c5352b29a@selasky.org> <c9f8bd7f-6d9d-bb6e-307c-a19c9730b564@microwave.sk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2020-10-01 10:24, Michal Vančo wrote: > But why is the actual number of IRQ lines bigger than number of CPU cores? There are some dedicated IRQ's used for firmware management. Else the driver will use the number of online CPU's by default as the number of rings, if the hardware supports it. --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c2fc9301-f085-189f-ca3a-42d1f97fd870>