Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 20:23:19 -0700 From: Gary Aitken <freebsd@dreamchaser.org> To: Pete Wright <pete@nomadlogic.org>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: which linux libfuse.so.2? Message-ID: <c55fa527-c0fe-97f2-d9d9-bc01aa092e23@dreamchaser.org> In-Reply-To: <8e50ba4b-a419-0d60-c2b5-1c379e2dc604@nomadlogic.org> References: <79254130-e926-fab3-9d5b-b6862c6b747b@dreamchaser.org> <8e50ba4b-a419-0d60-c2b5-1c379e2dc604@nomadlogic.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/9/21 1:56 PM, Pete Wright wrote: > > > On 2/9/21 11:11 AM, Gary Aitken wrote: >> I'm trying to run a linux binary (prusa-slicer) that is in >> .AppImage format. When run, it complains about missing >> libfuse.so.2. I believe this has to be a linux lib, not the fbsd >> one. So does it matter which version of linux it was built for? I >> presume I need the x86_64 version. Or can I just make a symlink in >> compat/linux/lib to the regular fbsd fuse library? > i think it would depend under which linux distro you are running > emulation from. if you are using the c7-linux packages to supply the > rest of the linux binaries for this program, I'd grab the CentOS rpm > for x86_64 (assuming your system is x86_64 and not arm). thanks. > there is also work happening on getting debian and ubuntu working > under freebsd - not sure about its availability on 11.4, but i use it > for GUI apps on my workstations: https://wiki.freebsd.org/LinuxJails > > the nice thing about this method, is once you've bootstrapped your > debian environment you can chroot into it and run "apt-get install > blah" and it all pretty much just works. thanks; I haven't really looked into that but may if time permits. But it's hard enough just keeping up with one system. ... >> And then, how do I unpack the rpm? > this is covered in the handbook here: > https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/handbook/linuxemu/ see section > 10.2.3 "Intall a Linux RPM Based Application". Thanks, my error in not going back and re-reading. I found a centos x86_64 version and unpacked it: $ ls -lt /compat/linux/usr/lib64 | head total 27564 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16176 Feb 9 19:32 libulockmgr.so.1.0.1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root wheel 20 Feb 9 19:32 libulockmgr.so.1 -> libulockmgr.so.1.0.1 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 269368 Feb 9 19:32 libfuse.so.2.9.7 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root wheel 16 Feb 9 19:32 libfuse.so.2 -> libfuse.so.2.9.7 But the .AppImage still chokes with an error loading the library: $ ./PrusaSlicer-2.3.0+linux-x64-202101111322.AppImage dlopen(): error loading libfuse.so.2 Do I need to do something other than place the lib in the right place? Is there a way to run /compat/linux/usr/bin/ldd to figure out what it is really looking for? I get the same error whether the symlink for libfuse.so.2 is present or not. If I try to run the linux ldd I get: $ /compat/linux/usr/bin/ldd PrusaSlicer-2.3.0+linux-x64-202101111322.AppImage bash: /compat/linux/usr/bin/ldd: /usr/bin/bash: bad interpreter: No such file or directory There is no /usr/bin/bash (it's in /usr/local/bin/bash), but there is a /compat/linux/usr/bin/bash. Gary
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c55fa527-c0fe-97f2-d9d9-bc01aa092e23>