Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 03:06:32 +0100 From: army.of.root <army.of.root@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Unicode-based FreeBSD Message-ID: <cad639fb0811141806r77f2ef50od51e20c14501f876@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <cad639fb0811141805we817c4dxb646b8a37bad3825@mail.gmail.com> References: <3cb459ed0808221700w335b0906g6901d8b8bec4dad9@mail.gmail.com> <6a7033710808241239p1cbdc7adwd4f87814b428b10b@mail.gmail.com> <3cb459ed0808241958v552eafejf7841f0f9993928e@mail.gmail.com> <slrnghj0b8.163f.vadim_nuclight@server.filona.x88.info> <3cb459ed0811110616t76235e72n24f2411a324a9807@mail.gmail.com> <3cb459ed0811110629g5c7cef8ascb024a9c1a920efa@mail.gmail.com> <20081111152011.GF9030@detritus.paeps.cx> <3cb459ed0811120718y755b123g90970461da2773be@mail.gmail.com> <20081113091808.12121w3199o1l2v4@webmail.leidinger.net> <cad639fb0811141805we817c4dxb646b8a37bad3825@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, I was just following the thread.. and don't have any idea how the stuff really works but here my 2cents: Wouldn't it be easier to just implement UTF-32 internally, because then the variable length of codepoints doesn't have to be handled anymore (they are all 4bytes long) ? It's a little bit overhed in most cases when just using ascii. And for further processing the text can be reencoded easily. regards PS: Thank you for contributing to FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cad639fb0811141806r77f2ef50od51e20c14501f876>