Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 13:27:19 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" <illoai@gmail.com> To: "Brett Glass" <brett@lariat.net> Cc: Philipp Wuensche <cryx-freebsd@h3q.com>, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Virally licensed code in FreeBSD kernel Message-ID: <d7195cff0704141127u34968161ieffee86c03704760@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200704141743.LAA09173@lariat.net> References: <200704140121.TAA29887@lariat.net> <4620D1DD.5050902@h3q.com> <200704141551.JAA07865@lariat.net> <4621078B.6070302@h3q.com> <200704141743.LAA09173@lariat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14/04/07, Brett Glass <brett@lariat.net> wrote: > At 10:55 AM 4/14/2007, Philipp Wuensche wrote: > > >Example: > >You create a binary from two source files. > > > >1. one BSD one CDDL. If you distribute this binary, you have to provide > >the CDDL part (and all modifications to it) as source under CDDL > >license. You are not required to provide the source of the BSD part. > > Yes, you are. Because it appears that the whole thing is now covered > by the CDDL. No, you are not. Because it appears that the whole thing is not covered by the CDDL. -- --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d7195cff0704141127u34968161ieffee86c03704760>