Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 09:57:37 +0100 From: Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: github ports Message-ID: <d920f15c-fee4-0532-0d95-d5728ff2ef8b@rail.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <9cf7e6cd-7eb2-3e21-f11c-1470f53a0107@FreeBSD.org> References: <20210110133605.6538dfd5@dismail.de> <CADnZ6B=Yy_fFUtAds3HjKZT10wNhGA6PzkYayc0mLNGoK_ug7Q@mail.gmail.com> <E79DB347-6EFA-458F-99B2-3E0177FB2AE5@kicp.uchicago.edu> <9cf7e6cd-7eb2-3e21-f11c-1470f53a0107@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 11/01/2021 à 09:42, Matthew Seaman a écrit : > On 10/01/2021 19:14, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > >> Just for my education: is there any advantage in using git like that >> instead of portsnap? > > Just that the git method will be supported in the future, whereas > portsnap is slated for removal, associated with the upcoming switch of > ports from SVN to git due at the end of Q1 this year. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > What is the solution for those who are not interessed/cannot handle the whole history with all branches ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d920f15c-fee4-0532-0d95-d5728ff2ef8b>