Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 6 Dec 2005 07:37:59 -0500
From:      "Joshua Coombs" <jcoombs@gwi.net>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS
Message-ID:  <dn40n8$5rc$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:  <dn2shd$2sr$1@sea.gmane.org> <20051206063134.GA57230@sysadm.stc>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

"Igor Robul" <igorr@speechpro.com> wrote in message 
news:20051206063134.GA57230@sysadm.stc...
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 09:20:28PM -0500, Joshua Coombs wrote:
>> #options                ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS
>>
>> What's the status of this in 6.0-R and 6-stable?  The idea of 
>> avoiding
>> memory copies when possible seems really appealing for my 386, on
>> which any little boost is significant. : )
> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.0R/relnotes-i386.html#KERNEL
>
> So you can't use FreeBSD-6.0 and greater on 80386 anymore.

Ok, lemmie just point out that I'm already running 6.0, just to 
eliminate that issue.

What I'm curious about is weather or not 6.0R's zero copy sockets are 
considered stable or not.

Joshua Coombs





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?dn40n8$5rc$1>