Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 26 Jan 2019 14:53:44 -0500
From:      "Myster.Hide" <acupuncture@cgocable.ca>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Wireless interface
Message-ID:  <e775f428-daf6-eb2c-8636-b5c1710830ad@cgocable.ca>
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR04MB04954E8E691D98C40B68607780940@MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References:  <CAPu-kW-0u=Eoj8NtASnD_WDnsosj_WcTEh=Zhby1DnBV3d2rdg@mail.gmail.com> <MWHPR04MB04954E8E691D98C40B68607780940@MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Le 26/01/2019 à 13:50, Carmel NY a écrit :
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 09:54:05 -0600, Rob Belics stated:
>
>>> It is situations like this that make me love
>>> Microsoft. Connecting a wireless network should not require user
>>> intervention other than choosing the network and entering the
>>> password.  
>> FreeBSD is not a consumer operating system. It's not designed to hand
>> hold anyone. That is why Windows is such a huge monstrosity of an
>> install.
> I just finished a fresh install of Windows 10. If you take the time
> involved in installing a basic MS Windows system vs. a basic FreeBSD
> system, Windows will usually win. A big plus is that Windows actually
> can get a wireless system up and running by itself, sans perhaps
> supplying the password. Does FreeBSD even support using the WPS Button
> on the Wi-Fi Router? Plus, you then have to install a GUI. Now, if you
> want to compare a FreeBSD system sans GUI, you have to compare it
> against a MS Server, not the regular Windows version design for home or
> office users.
>
> This is not about "hand-holding"; it is about bring the OS into the
> modern age. My machine is supposed to be my slave, not the other way
> around.
>
> Thanks for your comment anyway.
>
Windows is your slave? Really?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e775f428-daf6-eb2c-8636-b5c1710830ad>