Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 19:42:44 +0200 From: Mehmet Fatih AKBULUT <mfatihakbulut@gmail.com> To: "poczta@gbkonto.net" <poczta@gbkonto.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Linux Message-ID: <eed667140601170942g72091997i2cacb57927e35356@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7349.212.160.155.37.1137518111.squirrel@poczta.b.win.pl> References: <7349.212.160.155.37.1137518111.squirrel@poczta.b.win.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi, kernel is one of the differences ;) freebsd uses generic kernel. and one other important difference is freebsd doest not support my intel high definition audio card :( so no sound for years :'( [other distros debian, suse ... support my card.] instead of yum or apt-get, you have ports in freebsd.[ which is more efficient! this is my opinion of course ;)] fedora, debian or suse can be used as an OS for PCs, but freebsd mostly use= d as a server. not much suitable for PC usage. . . . bla bla bla. regards, bye.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?eed667140601170942g72091997i2cacb57927e35356>