Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:16:50 +0100 From: "Torfinn Ingolfsen" <tingox@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amule 2.2.3 port - first try Message-ID: <ef8c8a880812301216pc8a4da3l320fbfe9746abca5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20081230192455.GG81218@hades.panopticon> References: <ef8c8a880812291539h1eea43a6x66b9a7ee5928a4fe@mail.gmail.com> <20081230192455.GG81218@hades.panopticon>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> wrote: > * Torfinn Ingolfsen (tingox@gmail.com) wrote: > > It builds OK, but plist (and Makefile.man I guess) is incorrect. I knew about plist - I haven't done too much updating of that. I need to figure out a manageable way of maintaining it. Some files are added to the install based on what options a user chooses, and thererfore should only e added then. OTOH, there are just too many files add everything dynamically. Oh well, it must be fixed one way or the other. With regards to man pages,aMule ships with man pages for en, de, es, eu, fr and hu. However, the fr set is incomplete, almost half the man pages are missing. A few commands only have man pages in en and de languages. I'm not really sure how to handle this. Also, the man page are installed uncompressed, and it seems like 'make package' doesn't like that. > http://people.freebsd.org/~amdmi3/aMule-nooptimize-2.2.3.log I see that 'port test' also reports much of the same - porttools looks like a _very_ useful tool thanks to both Bernhard and you for pointing me towards it. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ef8c8a880812301216pc8a4da3l320fbfe9746abca5>