Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:52:22 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a proposed callout API Message-ID: <ekmr76$23g$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <11606.1164837711@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <200611292147.kATLll4m048223@apollo.backplane.com> <11606.1164837711@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <200611292147.kATLll4m048223@apollo.backplane.com>, Matthew Dillon w > rites: > >> The difference between you and me, Poul, is that you always try to play >> cute tricks with words when you intend to insult someone. Me? I just >> go ahead and insult them explicitly. > > I can do that too: You're a pompous asshole who doesn't know what > you're talking about. > > Now, does that make you feel better ? > >> In anycase, I think the relevance of my comments is clear to anyone who >> has followed the project. Are you guys so stuck up on performance >> that you are willing to seriously pollute your APIs just to get rid of >> a few multiplications and divisions? > > You have your project and we have ours. > > You make your choices, we make ours. > > You have your mailing lists, we have ours. > > CTRL-D for all I care. No trying to take sides here, but for us willing to learn here, what exactly are the problems in Matt Dillon's suggestions? From a novice's POV, having per-cpu queues looks (emphasis: looks) very scalable and performant.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ekmr76$23g$1>