Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 02 Mar 2007 02:17:31 +0100
From:      Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: defrag
Message-ID:  <es7tvd$b33$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070301221738.GA86154@gizmo.acns.msu.edu>
References:  <539c60b90703010849x33dd4bbbt8f6ca6aa0c8e83a0@mail.gmail.com>	<20070301192109.A24369@chylonia.3miasto.net>	<20070302085100.125cf488@localhost> <20070301221738.GA86154@gizmo.acns.msu.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
Jerry McAllister wrote:

> Well, it would do some, but for the greatest effect, you would need:
>   dump + rm -rf * + restore

This is nitpicking so ignore it: deleting all files on UFS2 volume won't
restore it to it's pristine state because inodes are lazily initialized.
It doesn't have anything to do with fragmentation, but will make fsck
run a little longer.


[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF53srldnAQVacBcgRAvvRAJ0Ti4A4iDU6LaTanfNrtIjT+wgrTQCfQMtj
jo+wIpv1tarqRACHQTJMUFs=
=75ay
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?es7tvd$b33$1>