Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:31:33 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Terabyte harddisks, GELI, AMD64, Samba and Zen... Message-ID: <evigul$o8f$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <1387491461.20070411043619@pyro.de> References: <1387491461.20070411043619@pyro.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Solon Luigi Lutz wrote: > -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random-- > -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks--- > Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU > 1000 37922 31.5 48829 12.0 23827 5.0 30054 36.0 43666 6.0 1120.0 2.5 Interesting - your CPU doesn't look overwhelmed much. > But I have not been able to get more than 17 MB/s when using Samba to > transfer data - FTP maxes out around 27 MB/s. I also tried that on > i386 32-bit and found it to be 8 MB/s and 17 MB/s - not good, but > nothing to worry. > > What made me feel really uncomfortable was the fact, that just some > minutes ago some 3000 1GB files suddenly disappeared while working > in a directory. They where gone, but the filesystem did not report > some additional 3TB to be free and after unmounting and remounting the > filesystem the files were back where the belonged... > This just happened some minutes later again, now with only 2500 files > dis- and -reappearing again. This can mean either file system corruption (which fsck fixed on boot?), a bug (read cache bug, where the memory representation of the directory doesn't agree with on-disk state) or a hardware memory error. Of these, hardware errors are easiest to check in your case. Download a memtest86 boot CD ISO, burn it and let it run for a few hours. Next, you can try a "full" fsck, which would probably a few last days on such a big array (big arrays are inconvenient to have without journaling). If both fail, we may look for a bug somewhere. > Questions until now: > > 1. 10TB as a single volume, too big for good? (fsck time: 30 min with softupdates) Yes, too big. Softupdates doesn't even do a full fsck - if you tried a full fsck it will require about a dozen GB of memory (or memory+swap) and take a really long time. If you're not scared of it, you should run 7-current and re-create the file system with gjournal, or even ZFS. > 2. GELI unstable on big disks and/or AMD64? You're the first to complain :) > 3. Why is Samba so slow? Search Google... Samba is notoriously slow on FreeBSD, but there are few ways to tune it which will help. > 4. Does the crypto-framwork gain speed advantages from dual-core CPUs? No, and the same goes for most GEOM classes. > 5. Will the GPT-stuff change over the next releases in a way I need to > do DUMP/RESTORE? I don't think so, except if someone discovers an incompatibility in the way FreeBSD handles GPT wrt other OSs. Shouldn't happen. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGHMcVldnAQVacBcgRAuq+AJ0dGxwPicstnxQ695SEUbGDgsQDVACeKSJ8 DuPvflsEB2TSW8FjMQ0aYdQ= =CceQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?evigul$o8f$1>
