Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 00:34:31 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: volume management Message-ID: <evmc62$s54$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <461BCF8A.3030307@freebsd.org> References: <461A5EC6.8010000@freebsd.org> <20070409154407.GA88621@harmless.hu> <evfqtt$n23$1@sea.gmane.org> <20070410111957.GA85578@garage.freebsd.pl> <461B75B2.40201@fer.hr> <20070410114115.GB85578@garage.freebsd.pl> <20070410161445.GA18858@keira.kiwi-computer.com> <20070410162129.GI85578@garage.freebsd.pl> <20070410172604.GA21036@keira.kiwi-computer.com> <461BCC85.2080900@freebsd.org> <20070410174607.GA26432@harmless.hu> <461BCF8A.3030307@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Eric Anderson wrote: > Personally, what I would want to prevent, is having a server go down due > to one file system having an issue, when it is serving (or using) many > more file systems. I currently have a box with 5 10Tb file systems on > it, and when I mount a 6th file system (2Tb) which I *know* has metadata > inconsistencies that fsck can't fix, I don't want it to take down all > 50Tb of good solid storage. This is slightly off-topic, but this is one of the reasons full virtualisation is used. If your kernel panics inside a VM, it's expendable :) [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGHrP9ldnAQVacBcgRAp4JAKDGLuq0kEKq0TDTMK309W2cB3ypAQCeK8uF M8mhEa22p07xuc7mTOWVvTY= =DkQ5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?evmc62$s54$1>