Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 16:48:16 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gjournal + gmirror question Message-ID: <f1a8bn$l9m$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <200705021631.02167.h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de> References: <200705021453.20372.h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de> <f1a3r8$2gg$1@sea.gmane.org> <46389DED.5060509@freebsd.org> <200705021631.02167.h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > Because it's a large fs with standard newfs parameters, so many inodes to > check... > Or does fsck recognize that it's a gjournaled UFS and skip unnessecarry > checks? > That's what my initinal interest was about. Judging from http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/fsck_ffs/gjournal.c you might be right, but I don't see it documented in man pages. IIRC Pawel did at one time explain that fsck will only delete stale/unreferenced inodes and so be quicker than usual. If you have the time for benchmarks, they would be appreciated :) [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGOKS2ldnAQVacBcgRAh74AKDfEEsBDXXrdJRRdkC0H99oEZsJKgCfa1an +xKUDnA/joyWyIwCLgrwzuY= =a23c -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f1a8bn$l9m$1>