Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 13:00:54 -0500 From: John DeStefano <john.destefano@gmail.com> To: Jerry McAllister <jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu> Cc: Yujin <flashweb@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 - Do i need both CD1 and CD2 ? Message-ID: <f2160e0d0601031000p48b2283cs2d816744275ebed@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200601031750.k03HobEM018016@clunix.cl.msu.edu> References: <f2160e0d0601030945x631b136fi48c1a4d4d176e2ac@mail.gmail.com> <200601031750.k03HobEM018016@clunix.cl.msu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/3/06, Jerry McAllister <jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu> wrote: > Just a question here -- What do you mean until it goes stable? > FreeBSD 6.0 is already at RELEASE which is beyond stable. > So you have the terminology mangled or just the typing? You're right: per the FreeBSD world, I've botched the two terms. But if we're talking pure semantics, wouldn't you be more likely to entrust something labelled "STABLE" over a similar thing labelled "RELEASE"? ;) And of course, I'm now much more interested that procedure than I was a few minutes ago! Thanks, ~John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f2160e0d0601031000p48b2283cs2d816744275ebed>