Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 25 Feb 2017 09:47:22 -0600
From:      Eric van Gyzen <eric@vangyzen.net>
To:        Eric Badger <eric@badgerio.us>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: procfs ctl interface
Message-ID:  <f3d29c53-b947-21a9-769e-e1098039f606@vangyzen.net>
In-Reply-To: <451312a7-9ae9-c5a1-4153-2268039c5942@badgerio.us>
References:  <451312a7-9ae9-c5a1-4153-2268039c5942@badgerio.us>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02/24/2017 19:43, Eric Badger wrote:
> I started working on a change that will perturb procfs' ctl interface to some
> degree. In looking closer at procfs, it seems like it has been pretty well
> broken for use as a debugging interface since at least 9.3 (the oldest system I
> have handy). Is there any reason to maintain this interface at all? If anything,
> it should perhaps be made into an alternate front end for ptrace() rather than
> being entirely separate, but I'm not sure I see the value in that.

As I recall, the last in-tree consumer was gcore, but attilio@ switched it to 
ptrace in r199805.

If nobody mentions a significant consumer, garbage-collecting it sounds good to me.

Eric



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f3d29c53-b947-21a9-769e-e1098039f606>