Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 16 Jun 2007 12:21:42 +0200
From:      Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Upgrading to amd64 requires recompilation of ports?
Message-ID:  <f50dkg$m71$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070616030328.GA17075@rot13.obsecurity.org>
References:  <6f50eac40706151829g64b8a8abg798f97449c05888f@mail.gmail.com>	<f4veun$kq4$2@sea.gmane.org> <20070616030328.GA17075@rot13.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigEC52FFCC9986EF95AE355B27
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 03:38:29AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
>> Indigo 23 wrote:
>>
>>> the ports? (I already know that it does require a recompilation of
>>> world and the kernel).
>> AFAIK nobody has succeeded in this (i.e. upgrading i386 to amd64 via
>> buildkernel/world) on-line far enough to tell the tale. You might be t=
he
>> first :)
>=20
> Nah, I've done it several times.

That's good news. Are there any particular problems in the process or
does it "just work"?


--------------enigEC52FFCC9986EF95AE355B27
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGc7nPldnAQVacBcgRApyKAKDpRFm41IJR1L87EUAr9TJfgbZZoQCdHwds
wT1S8unvuEataG3sJLjr1Lg=
=3HyL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigEC52FFCC9986EF95AE355B27--




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f50dkg$m71$1>