Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      26 Mar 2024 18:01:34 -0400
From:      "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To:        "Sad Clouds" <cryintothebluesky@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: local-unbound vs. dns/unbound
Message-ID:  <fcf7b0f2-aba1-f4b4-267c-eda9eb4bbc68@iecc.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240326204728.77de2d013a1cf546b8abe03d@gmail.com>
References:  <20240326182155.f49f1239901deabb0dafb84d@gmail.com> <20240326194028.516F58634567@ary.qy> <20240326204728.77de2d013a1cf546b8abe03d@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>
>> It's a copy of unbound with a setup script that configures it as
>> a cache to run on 127.0.0.1.  It looks in /etc/resolv.conf to use
>> any DNS forwarding you've set up and some other places for
>> stuff that seems more exotic.

> Thanks. I'm not too fussed about using the latest version, as long as
> functionality is mostly the same. I'll play around with local-unbound
> and see if I can make it work for my use cases.

As far as I know, it's the same program with a different setup script.

My main concern is that the setup script might overrwrite your changes 
when you do a system upgrade.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fcf7b0f2-aba1-f4b4-267c-eda9eb4bbc68>