Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 02:10:40 +0000 (UTC) From: "G. Paul Ziemba" <pz-freebsd-ports@ziemba.us> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proposal: mechanism for local patches Message-ID: <gh4pr0$p3b$1@hairball.ziemba.us> References: <20081202192410.GA69963@sysmon.tcworks.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
lambert@lambertfam.org (Scott Lambert) writes:
>How about something like WRKDIRPREFIX?
>Presumably the logic for dealing with that structure is already in
>the system. Maybe you could have USE_LOCAL_PATCHES boolean which
>uses ${CATEGORY}/${PORTNAME}/files subdirs in WRKDIRPREFIX, or
>LOCALPATCHDIRPREFIX if you want to keep your patches in CVS/SVN without
>polluting the CVS/SVN working directory.
I'm not sure I undersand - do you mean that you'd pick one of
$(WRKDIRPREFIX)/${CATEGORY}/${PORTNAME}/files or
$(LOCALPATCHDIRPREFIX)/${CATEGORY}/${PORTNAME}/files to get
patches from, based on the state of USE_LOCAL_PATCHES? But I was
hoping to augment $(WRKDIRPREFIX)/${CATEGORY}/${PORTNAME}/files
instead of replacing it.
--
G. Paul Ziemba
FreeBSD unix:
6:06PM up 2 days, 3:36, 8 users, load averages: 1.55, 1.38, 1.31
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?gh4pr0$p3b$1>