Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 21:54:15 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Request for opinions - gvinum or ccd? Message-ID: <h0ehhv$sic$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <A5BB2D2B836A4438B1B7BD8420FCC6A3@uk.tiscali.intl> References: <20090530175239.GA25604@logik.internal.network><20090530144354.2255f722@bhuda.mired.org><20090530191840.GA68514@logik.internal.network> <20090530162744.5d77e9d1@bhuda.mired.org> <A5BB2D2B836A4438B1B7BD8420FCC6A3@uk.tiscali.intl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig8A4D4BEFD98B51E042DCFB4A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sorry to come into the discussion late, but I just want to confirm something. The configuration below is a stripe of four components, each of which is RAIDZ2, right? If, as was discussed later in the thread, RAIDZ(2) is more similar to RAID3 than RAID5 for random performance, the given configuration can be (very roughly, in the non-sequential access case) expected to deliver performance of four drives in a RAID0 array? krad wrote: > zpool create -O compression=3Dlzjb -O atime=3Doff data raidz2 c3t0d0 c4= t0d0 > c8t0d0 c10t0d0 c11t0d0 c3t1d0 c4t1d0 c8t1d0 c9t1d0 c10t1d0 c11t1d0 raid= z2 > c3t2d0 c4t2d0 c8t2d0 c9t2d0 c11t2d0 c3t3d0 c4t3d0 c8t3d0 c9t3d0 c10t3d0= > c11t3d0 raidz2 c3t4d0 c4t4d0 c8t4d0 c10t4d0 c11t4d0 c3t5d0 c4t5d0 c8t5d= 0 > c9t5d0 c10t5d0 c11t5d0 raidz2 c3t6d0 c4t6d0 c8t6d0 c9t6d0 c10t6d0 c11t6= d0 > c3t7d0 c4t7d0 c9t7d0 c10t7d0 c11t7d0 spare c10t2d0 c8t7d0 > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > archive-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 > raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c3t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c4t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c8t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c10t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c11t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c3t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c8t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c9t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c10t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c11t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c3t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c8t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c9t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c11t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c3t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c8t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c9t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c10t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c11t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c3t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c8t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c10t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c11t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c3t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c8t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c9t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c10t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c11t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c3t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c4t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c8t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c9t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c10t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c11t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c3t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c9t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c10t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c11t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > spares > c10t2d0 AVAIL =20 > c8t7d0 AVAIL =20 >=20 > errors: No known data errors --------------enig8A4D4BEFD98B51E042DCFB4A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkoqyWcACgkQldnAQVacBch45QCg6gYkbS8wV11vCTKwWkg2rG8F enUAoNGL+BLfpqo44djV1WYynCcy8PyB =5Aly -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig8A4D4BEFD98B51E042DCFB4A--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?h0ehhv$sic$1>