Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:27:25 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Improving old-fashioned UFS2 performance with lots of inodes... Message-ID: <ivmgad$h72$1@dough.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <CADLo838uyJYK9_HpWFm_5vuXaihm5fca%2Bxvay73EeYen%2Buw2Ng@mail.gmail.com> References: <1309217450.43651.YahooMailRC@web120014.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <20110628010822.GA41399@icarus.home.lan> <CADLo838uyJYK9_HpWFm_5vuXaihm5fca%2Bxvay73EeYen%2Buw2Ng@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/07/2011 16:06, Chris Rees wrote: > On 28 June 2011 02:08, Jeremy Chadwick<freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> wrote: >> >> On what exact OS version? Please don't say "8.2", need to know >> 8.2-RELEASE, -STABLE, or what. You said "8.x" above, which is too >> vague. If 8.2-STABLE you should not be tuning vm.kmem_size_max at all, >> and you probably don't need to tune vm.kmem_size either. > > We don't do 8.2-STABLE, it's 8-STABLE.... Yeah, but colloquially "8.2-STABLE" means "8-STABLE in between 8.2 and 8.3 releases"... it's not a new thing.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ivmgad$h72$1>